Thursday, February 09, 2006

With the cross of Jesus / Marching on before

It seems I have opened a door into something much larger, and this through a process of reading Walter Wink’s The Powers that Be: Theology for a New Millennium (Galilee/Doubleday, 1998)

And what are the Powers? Here is Wink’s description:

Latin American liberation theology made one of the first efforts to reinterpret the “principalities and powers,” not as disembodies spirits inhabiting the air, but as institutions, structures and systems. The Powers are simultaneously an outer, visible structure and an inner, spiritual reality. What people in the world of the Bible experienced as and called “principalities and powers” was in fact the actual spirituality at the center of the political, economic and cultural institutions of their day. (Powers That Be, 24)

Wink continues:

It is merely a habit of thought that makes people think of the Powers as personal beings. In fact, many of the spiritual powers and gods of the ancient world were not conceived of as personal at all. I prefer to think of the Powers as impersonal entities, though I know of no sure way to settle the question. Humans naturally tend to personalize anything that seems to act intentionally. But we are now discovering from computer viruses that certain systemic processes are self-replicating and “contagious,” behaving almost willfully even though they are quite impersonal. For the present, I [Wink] have set aside the question of the actual status of these Powers, and instead have attempted to describe what it was that people in ancient times were experiencing when they spoke of “Satan,” “demons,” “powers,” “angels,” and the like. “None of these “spiritual” realities has an existence independent of its material counterpart. None persists through time without embodiment in a people or a culture or a regime or a corporation or a dictator.

The issue is not whether we “believe,” in them but whether we can learn to identify them in our actual, everyday encounters. When a particular Power becomes idolatrous—that is, when it pursues a vocation other than the one for which God created it and makes its own interests the highest good—then that Power becomes demonic. The spiritual task is to unmask this idolatry and recall the Powers to their created purposes in the world. But this can scarcely be accomplished by individuals. A group is needed—what the New Testament calls an ekklesia (assembly)—one that exists specifically for the task of recalling these Powers to their divine vocation.

Evil, then, is not just personal but structural and spiritual. It is not simply the result of human actions, but the consequence of huge systems [Dominations Systems] over which no individual has full control. Only by confronting the spirituality of an institution and its physical manifestations can the total structure be transformed. Any attempt to transform a social system without addressing both its spirituality and its outer forms is doomed to failure. (Ibid. 27, 30-31)

Now an address by Dan Liechty, "Principalities and Powers: A Beckerian Reading of Walter Wink's The Powers Trilogy."

"In the Yoder/Berkhof line of interpretation, Principalities and Powers are understood as social forces, encompassing

an inclusive vision of religious structure (especially the religious undergirdings of stable ancient and primitive societies), intellectual structures (`ologies and `isms), moral structures (codes and customs), political structures (the tyrant, the market, the school, the courts, race, and nation).

Walter Wink's voluminous work self-consciously builds on and extends this line of interpretation. Wink's approach emphasizes the following points, which will also become our final points of comparison for a social scientific view.

The Powers are Good. Wink suggests that the Powers were created by God for the ordering of human community. The Powers are part of the original creation of God and, as such, were created good, like all of God's original creation. If the Powers functioned according to God's original intention, they would be our ally in assuring that people are fed, goods are distributed to those in need, and in general, that communal laws would govern life together for the common good.

The Powers are Fallen. But these Powers are in rebellion against God's original intentions. As such, these Powers act in accordance with the `system of domination,' creating vast inequalities and injustices in the economic order. They make themselves the hand servants of the worst of human emotions and motivations, of greed, envy, revenge and violence. They facilitate actions leading to ecological destruction, inequality and injustice, making such actions appear `logical' and `inevitable,' causing good people to act accordingly, even as they may personally regret the results.

The Powers must be Redeemed. Christ has brought redemption for the Powers. They have been broken and shown in the Cross to be a mockery of God's justice and goodness. The decisive battle against the Powers has been won in the Cross of Christ. The task now is to bring the Powers to this recognition and to allow them again to function for the common good according to God's original intention.

The eschatological Christian community is God's tool to bring this redemption of the Powers into historical reality. The problem arises when Christians themselves fail to recognize this corporate and transpersonal element in God's salvation and retreat into satisfaction with personal salvation, the world be damned. They then become easy prey for the fallen Powers, seducing them into acting corporately and politically according to the Powers' own fallen dictates. Christians then begin to value `patriotic duty' as equal to or above their Christian commitments. They begin to lean toward the `expediency' of violent solutions to political problems. They close their eyes to the systemic inequalities and injustices of economic and political systems, however much they may regret the suffering that results. And worst of all, they begin to play power politics within the Christian community itself on the model of the fallen Powers rather than according to Christ's suffering love, thus diluting and negating the very high calling with which God entrusted them."

One more note from Wink. He writes:

William Stringfellow's Free in Obedience(New York: Seabury, 1964) had provided me a vision of how the biblical category of principalities and powers could serve as the basis for a social ethic based on the New Testament. The received wisdom till then was that the New Testament is only concerned with personal ethics; if one is interested in a social ethic, one must turn to the Exodus or the prophets. Work on the Powers series, first conceived as a single volume, grew into three, and occupied 28 years. The titles in the Powers trilogy are Naming the Powers, Unmasking the Powers, and Engaging the Powers (which was awarded the "Best Religious Book of 1993.”) A related volume, Cracking the Gnostic Code, rounds out the understanding of the Powers in the early centuries of our era.

And a nod toward his solution to the Powers:

I became increasingly convinced that nonviolence was the only way to overcome the domination of the Powers without creating new forms of domination. (Walter Wink, “Write What You See: An Odyssey.” The Fourth R Vol. 7 No. 3 (May/June 1994)

Now all of this meshes quite well with what N.T. Wright was saying about Colossians. And, as I said, it opens a door for me that hasn’t been opened before, both to the role of the liberal arts, as I stated, and also for the role of the church and its people: people like me going about their Kingdom-work within the everyday.
__________
Walter Wink, Professor Emeritus of Biblical Interpretation at Auburn Theological Seminary, New York, NY. has worn many hats. Previously, he was a parish minister and taught at Union Theological Seminary in New York City. And, in 1989-1990, he was a Peace Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace. His many award winning books include: The Powers That Be: Theology for a New Millennium, Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination, Unmasking the Powers: The Invisible Forces That Determine Human Existence, Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament and When the Powers Fall: Reconciliation in the Healing of Nations

Most recently, Wink has written The Human Being: Jesus and the Enigma of the Son of the Man(Fortress Press, 2001; read scholar's responses.) and edited the book, Peace Is The Way: Writings on Nonviolence from the Fellowship of Reconciliation(Orbis Books, 2000.)

__________
See the previous post in this series, Unmasking the Powers with N. T. Wright

; ; ; ; ;

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:30 PM

    It seems to me that Wright and Rushdoony have a lot in common with regards to political structures - they just come from opposite ends of the poltical stream.

    John

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having not read Rushdooney, I have no idea. You seem to have a better opinion of him than my seminary prof's did.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10:57 AM

    What we really need here is about three pitchers of tea and three hours of conversation, because I have not read Wright (nor really that much of Rushdoony).

    But it appears that the powers and dominion are taking on a very temporal and political cast for you. As opposed to a demonic/satanic/plain old worldly cast.

    Again, I'm not prejudging where you are heading but observing that if the powers and dominions are temporal and if we are to change them (that is take dominion - which is plainly what we would be doing if we change them to our liking) then we have to head in a direction either politically left or right.

    To the left we have the socialist state, beginning with the collective society we have collective responsibility, collective property, the distribution of economic goods (in smaller and smaller portions), and the thought police that must maintain the prestige of the state - because to speak against it is to impugn the group.

    To the right we have the society founded not on a collection of individuals but on the family as the basic unit. Inherent individual dignity, individual responsibility (both to care for yourself, your family, and others), diffused levels of government starting with the family and going up through the state.

    The question is which direction is biblical and will stand the test of experience. No system will be perfect (because the system itself must take into account the fallen nature of man). We do not need new institutions nearly so much as we need a new humanity (Henry).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Note the upcoming book: Gingerich, Ray C., and Theodore C. Grimsrud. Transforming the Powers: Peace, Justice and the Domination System. (Fortress Press, March 15, 2006.)

    Walter Wink's widely acclaimed trilogy from Fortress Press — Naming the Powers 0-8006-1786-X (1984), Unmasking the Powers 0-8006-1902-1 (1993), and Engaging the Powers 0-8006-2646-X (1992) — has sold over 80,000 copies. The Powers are good; the Powers are fallen; the Powers must be redeemed, says Wink; and the illustrious theologians and ethicists in this volume apply this suggestive analysis to economics, politics and government, war and peace, personal ethics and ecological and social justice.

    Contributors include:
    Ray Gingerich, Eastern Mennonite University
    Ted Grimsrud, Eastern Mennonite University
    Nancey Murphy, Fuller Theological Seminary
    Daniel Liechty, Illinois State University
    Walter Wink, Auburn Theological Seminary
    Willard M. Swartley, Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary
    Glen Stassen, Fuller Theological Seminary

    Format: Paperback 224 pages 6 x 9 inches
    Item No: 0800638174

    ReplyDelete
  5. John, (a) Isn't there a way to post where you can use your name instead of just the impersonal "anonymous"? (b) You raise some good points I hadn't considered. This level of the conversation isn't quite available yet to my thinking. I'm just beginning to understand the practice of Christian faith in terms of the Kingdom, and now there is a way of thinking about the mission of the church in that same light. You are right, there is a definite leftist lean on the whole thing - Wink isn't pure left, but favors the left. His teaching about nonviolence is more nuanced than simply advocating pacifism. (And I haven't gotten to that part of the book, yet.) What this is doing is opening up a vocabulary. What to do once that vocabulary is in place, in other words, how to take it forward in the dimensions you describe, that hasn't occurred to me. I guess I'm still at the point where you pray for the Kingdom and seek to live it out ethically where you can, and that is too small a horizon for the consideration of larger, more immanent, political directions.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Paul Whiting recently posted on Michel Foucault, and his comments are worth reading in the consideration of this thread. Scripture is not Foucault, nor Foucault the Scriptures, but an awareness of his insights about the ubuiquity and anonymity of power is helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In Wink's _Powers that Be_, he discusses the overthrow of the Christus Victor theory of the atonment by a theology of empire: "The church no longer saw the demonic as lodged in the empire, but in the empire's enemies." The critique of the cross, whereby Jesus is understood as having overcome the Powers, is, thus, lost. Interesting enough. Still, his exegesis leaves some to be desired. For example, he writes, "The forgiveness of which Colossians 2:13-15 speaks is forgiveness for complicity in our own oppression and in that of others. . . . The Law itself is one of the Powers that separates us from the love of God; it is the "letter" which "kills" (2 Cor. 3:6). Therefore Jesus "gave himself for our sins to set us free from this Domination Epoch (aion--Gal. 1:4)."(90) At first glance, it seems that Dr. Wink has misunderstood the Law itself, and therefore it makes sense that he rejects Hebrew's understanding of Jesus as sacrifice, since that is grounded in the Law and its fulfillment.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "The key to the obedience of God’s people is not their effectiveness but their patience. The triumph of the right is assured not by the might that comes to the aid of the right, which is of course the justification of the use of violence and the other kinds of power in every human conflict; the triumph of the right, although it is assured, is sure because of the power of the resurrection and not because of any calculation of causes and effects, nor because of the inherently greater strength of the good guys. The relationship between the obedience of God’s people and the triumph of God’s cause is not a relationship of cause and effect but one of cross and resurrection." ~John Howard Yoder Politics of Jesus.

    ReplyDelete