The innate dynamism of the modern economy, and of the culture that grows from this economy, annihilates everything that it creates--physical environments, social institutions, metaphysics ideas, artistic visions, moral values--in order to create more, to go on endlessly creating the world anew. This drive draws all modern men and women into its orbit, and forces us all to grapple with the question of what is essential, what is meaningful, what is real in the maelstrom in which we move and live.
Berman goes on to describe his own experience of modernity growing up the Bronx in the late-40’s. Overnight, from out of nowhere, the idyllic Jewish & Irish neighborhoods of his youth were torn apart by “an immense expressway, unprecedented in scale, expense and difficulty of construction.” Worse, he continues, this was done on the back of the very values of the dispossessed. To oppose the destruction of their homes was to oppose “progress.” To oppose “bridges, tunnels, expressways, housing developments, power dams, stadia, cultural centers . . . few people, especially in New York [are] prepared to do that.” New Yorkers identify themselves and their city with progress, and so the world beloved by Berman’s family and tens of thousands of their neighbors was destroyed “in the name of values that we ourselves embraced.”
This, friends, is the wave that has us all. This is the overwhelming cultural current in which we all live. From the latest rise of Islamic terrorism from eastern Mosques to the malaise and alienation we feel in our Western churches: this is the riptide that joins us both. And it is disorienting. One may experience it as “alienation” one moment and as “freedom” the next.
It's effect is omnipresent. I hear it in the guitar stylings of Jimi Hendrix--the way he sweeps effortlessly along the frets, touching his figertips down lightly here or there just long enough to tap on or half bend a note which races off again--and in the anthropology of psychologist and one-time-cofounder of the Frankfurt School, Erich Fromm.
In Fromm's last book, To Have or to Be (Abacus 1976), he argues that two ways of existence are competing for "the spirit of mankind": having and being. The having mode looks to things and material possessions and is based on aggression and greed. The being mode is rooted in love and is concerned with shared experience and productive activity. The book ends by asking about the new man and the new society.
So then, have we come any further than the 1960’s? Is John’s apocalpytic city of the world, Babylon, really so apocalyptic, or is it the air we breathe, the way we dress and the political discourse of our nations? Fundamentalism is not an option; the church can’t hide from this. Some meaningful response has to be spoken into the gale, some way of properly saying “Kingdom” into the podcasts & videophones of the world. Some way of making words meaningful again, when we ourselves hardly find them so.
This entire series can also be read as a single document.
modernity; Erich Fromm; Marshall Berman; All That Is Solid Melts Into Air; Jimi Hendrix; progress.
Die Welt, 14.07.2005
ReplyDeleteIn an interview with Ekkehard Fuhr, sociologist Ulrich Beck explains why full employment is an illusion, how the labour market is becoming "Brasilianised", and why we should read Franz Kafka to understand how this is happening: "There is a considerable overlap between the theoretical idea of the 'second modernity' and what Kafka attempts to express in 'The Metamorphosis'. What is happening is a metamorphosis, and not a crisis. So there is no going back to how things were before. The theory of the second modernity holds that the radical implementation of the principles of modernity – autonomy of the individual, the market, scientific rationality, etc. – pulls the carpet out from under the modern institutions – above all the national state. As in 'The Metamorphosis', something happens to us that we don't want, and that we don't want to accept or understand. An ever larger discrepancy is emerging between our situation and our concepts of reality and normality. Kafka describes this with incredible precision. His works belong to the classics of sociology."
It is the state of man to thrive, to create, to destroy. Our creative urge is a characteristic from God, only twisted into a dark caricature. At Babel we strove with the raw matter of the earth to create our own godhood and suffered for our pride. The Romans, unchecked by the hordes of visgoths,ostrogoths, etc.., could have created an early equivilant of our modern world. God has ever had to check that impulse and it is only now in these last days that it goes unbridled to bring about a second and final Babel.
ReplyDeleteJason, you would do well to read an introduction to Hegel (though not Hegel himself, who is far too difficult.) Your concept of history and the Spirit working within it bears great correspondence with Hegel and his historical dialectic of history as the development of the "world soul" or Geist.
ReplyDelete